Gibson LP Jimmy Page - Review
Jimmy Page has always been associated with Les Pauls and Telecasters. This 1996 version is under review here by Tony Mckenzie...
WhatsNew:
Review of GR-55 from Roland Corp.
6th April 2011
A review of the GR-55 Guitar Synth. Does this thing REALLY stack up where it
matters - on the fretboard? or is it just another revamp of the GR-20? Check it out
HERE its online right now.
Also the YJM100
new amp head from Marshall amps here in the UK... a no holds barred review from
Tony Mckenzie. Input also by Santiago Alvarez from Marshall Amplification.
CurrentNews:
Kemper Profiling Amp Review
1st January 2012
Updated 28th January 2012
I recently bought a Kemper Profiling Amplifier and have reviewed this unit inside and out on tonymckenzie.com - and right from the start this amp sounds good.
check out the review and do yourself a favour - the Kemper Profiling Amp really is something to behold and promises users a new era in guitar amps. But just how good is this amp? Find out on tonymckenzie.com right now.
Check out this review online now .. trust us to look at a revolutionary product in a way that others simply do not.
I updated the review at the end to show how I used the Kemper with an amp and 4 x 12 Marshall cab and include other new info on this great product.
LatestReviews:
Divided by 13 FTR37
January 2nd 2012
I
recently completed with Dan Kelly a review of the Divided by 13 FTR37 top end
tube power amp and it's matched speaker cab. Check that review out
Divided by 13.
Later we took the Divided by 13 amp and profiled it with a Kemper Profiling Amp - check the video out
I also reviewed recently some old favourite pickups and show a demo of David White pickups for the Stratocaster. David passed away some time ago but he left a fantastic legacy if you can find any... Click here for David White Pickups
Gibson LP Jimmy Page - Review
Gibson Les Paul Jimmy Page Model Review
There's a story behind this guitar that some may find hard to believe. I
purchased this guitar in 1996 from Musical Exchanges in Birmingham England and
from the outset the guitar sounded awesome - this guitar was used extensively on
the Rainy Days Album back in 96, the Live! Album and on some tracks from the
Blue Moon Album of 1999.
There was one problem, it kept breaking top E strings. The guitar was returned
to the supplier and they "fixed it" but within a week the strings were breaking
again ( around 10 a week! ). The supplier changed the bridge from a brand new
guitar and the breakages dropped down to three or four strings a week.... not
really good enough because this guitar was used as a main instrument at that
time. The supplier decided to order a replacement from Gibson and in the
meantime loaned me the one that the bridge had come from. This guitar did not
break strings but it had been extensively misused and had multitudes of lacquer
cracks - common on Gibson guitars.
The loan guitar sounded so different to the one that I had bought that it was
hardly usable and I decided that this must have been due to the misuse of that
instrument. After around six weeks the new guitar arrived at the suppliers and I
took the old one with me to collect the replacement. The new guitar looked fine
and I was about to leave but something told me to "just checkout the sound" on
the guitar.
The supplier had a Boogie Mark IV in stock so I plugged in, cranked the volume
and.... the sound was as crap as the one that they had loaned me. I immediately
spoke with Gary the man at the top in the store and demonstrated that the sound
was not acceptable. Gary still had my old guitar - the one in the picture below
- to compare and sure enough this guitar blew away BOTH of the other instruments
in the comparison. Remember, these were exactly the same Gibson Model's.
It was decided there and then by me that I was not going to let this guitar go
back to Gibson at all, and he changed again the bridge from the new guitar to
the one that he originally had. The supplier merely said that my guitar had a
wiring "fault" and that his other guitars were the way the JP Les Paul should
sound (!) .... but he did agree that "the others were not playable" when
compared to my original guitar.
Today, the guitar will typically take out a string in around 3 hours continuous
playing - not a problem if you KNOW this.
Well with a background like the one above - surely it's time to sell this pain
in the neck? Well no - it's probably one of the best sounding guitars I have -
with that custom Jimmy Page neck - and it really is - this guitar is a keeper.
The prices on these is now rising. When Gibson bought out the new revision of
this they and others slagged this one off as a 'poor copy' of Jimi Pages guitar
- but that was not always the case. Originally they said this was an exact copy.
Who knows - and I don't care. All I can say, is that if you want a REAL Les
Paul
- then this is as good as it gets - broken strings and all. I don't really mind
those they are cheap to fix. This guitar cost £2800.00 pounds in about 1995 so
it was very expensive then. I have seen these fetching more than £5000 pounds in
the UK in this condition if you can find one - most are tatty.
I would rate this guitar at 10 out of 10 if I had a guitar rating system - it is
simply THAT good.
Here's what I like the most:
- Custom neck - excellent to play
- Quality of construction
- Excellent Les Paul sound - maybe even Jimmy Pages exact sound? Who knows???
- Nice weight
- Rarity of this model
For heavy rock this is not the guitar - Ibanez are relegated to that task - but for Classic Rock (Like Zep) then this is the only tool you will need with a Marshall and a wah pedal
Heres a link to Gibson site: www.gibson.com














